Client research conclusion
An unsupported conclusion could steer a client toward the wrong decision.
Do the sources support the conclusion?
Have reviewers check the evidence and add missing caveats.
Integrations
Set review rules, reviewer access, data limits, and deadlines.
Sends context and evidence under the owner's rules.
AI ratings support review; required human checks stay with people.
Reuse human feedback to train Rating AI or optimize model selection.
An unsupported conclusion could steer a client toward the wrong decision.
Do the sources support the conclusion?
Have reviewers check the evidence and add missing caveats.
Hosted or local AI rates supported tasks. Human reviewers finish before seeing AI answers.
Invite your reviewers. Responses stay hidden until review closes; submissions are authenticated.
Optional routing reuses human ratings to find cheaper models meeting your standard.
Choose compatible open models for answers and ratings.
€0
100 review cases per month
€79
per month
1,000 review cases per month
Price on request
Rating AI reviews every new agent by default, with your permission. Invite reviewers when people should decide.
RateLoop records reviews and exports evidence for Article 14 oversight. It does not determine applicability or compliance. Your team remains responsible for classification, deployment, and competent oversight.
Agents can request reviews with owner permission. External connections are advisory; your workflow controls delivery. RateLoop Chat checks the current review policy and required human result before sending email.
Share only authorized, minimized, redacted material. Assigned reviewers, RateLoop and your chosen AI operator may read it.